Overview | PrinterFriendlyVersion |
Ex/Em(nm) | 780/800 |
MW | 1353.57 |
CAS# | N/A |
Solvent | DMSO |
Storage | F/D/L |
Category | ClassicLabelingDyes Cyanines |
Related | PeptideLabelingReagents DyeLabelingReagents BiochemicalAssays |
Spectrum | AdvancedSpectrumViewer |
SampleLabelingProtocol
Note:ThislabelingprotocolwasdevelopedfortheconjugateofGoatanti-mouseIgGwithICG.Youmightneedfurtheroptimizationforyourparticularproteins.
1.Prepareproteinstocksolution(SolutionA):
Mix100µLofareactionbuffer(e.g.,1M sodiumcarbonatesolutionor1MphosphatebufferwithpH~9.0)with900µLofthetargetproteinsolution(e.g.antibody,proteinconcentration>2mg/mlifpossible)togive1mLproteinlabelingstocksolution.
Note1:ThepHoftheproteinsolution(SolutionA)shouldbe8.5±0.5.IfthepHoftheproteinsolutionislowerthan8.0,adjustthepHtotherangeof8.0-9.0using1M sodiumbicarbonatesolutionor1MpH9.0phosphatebuffer.
Note2:Theproteinshouldbedissolvedin1Xphosphatebufferedsaline(PBS),pH7.2-7.4.IftheproteinisdissolvedinTrisorglycinebuffer,itmustbedialyzedagainst1XPBS,pH7.2-7.4,toremovefreeaminesorammoniumsalts(suchasammoniumsulfateandammoniumacetate)thatarewidelyusedforproteinprecipitation.
Note3:ImpureantibodiesorantibodiesstABIlizedwithbovineserumalbumin(BSA)orgelatinwillnotbelabeledwell.Thepresenceofsodiumazideorthimerosalmightalsointerferewiththeconjugationreaction.Sodiumazideorthimerosalcanberemovedbydialysisorspincolumnforoptimallabelingresults.
Note4:Theconjugationefficiencyissignificantlyreducediftheproteinconcentrationislessthan2mg/mL.Foroptimallabelingefficiencythefinalproteinconcentrationrangeof2-10mg/mLisrecommended.
2.Preparedyestocksolution(SolutionB):
AddanhydrousDMSOintothevialofICGdyestomakea10-20mMstocksolution.Mixwellbypipettingorvortex.
Note:Preparethedyestocksolution(SolutionB)beforestartingtheconjugation.Usepromptly.Extendedstorageofthedyestocksolutionmayreducethedyeactivity.SolutionBcanbestoredinfreezerfortwoweekswhenkeptfromlightandmoisture.Avoidfreeze-thawcycles.
3.Determinetheoptimaldye/proteinratio(optional):
Note:Eachproteinrequiresdistinctdye/proteinratio,whichalsodependsonthepropertiesofdyes.Overlabelingofaproteincoulddetrimentallyaffectsitsbindingaffinitywhiletheproteinconjugatesoflowdye/proteinratiogivesreducedsensitivity.Werecommendyouexperimentallydeterminethebestdye/proteinratiobyrepeatingSteps4and5usingaserialdifferentamountoflabelingdyesolutions.Ingeneral4-6dyes/proteinarerecommendedformostofdye-proteinconjugates.
3.1 Use10:1molarratioofSolutionB(dye)/SolutionA(protein)asthestartingpoint: Add5µlofthedyestocksolution(SolutionB,assumingthedyestocksolutionis10mM)intothevialoftheproteinsolution(95µlofSolutionA)witheffectiveshaking.Theconcentrationoftheproteinis~0.05mMassumingtheproteinconcentrationis10mg/mLandthemolecularweightoftheproteinis~200KD.
Note:TheconcentrationoftheDMSOintheproteinsolutionshouldbe<10%.
3.2 Runconjugationreaction(seeStep4below).
3.3 Repeat#3.2withthemolarratiosofSolutionB/SolutionAat5:1;15:1and20:1respectively.
3.4 Purifythedesiredconjugatesusingpremadespincolumns.
3.5 Calculatethedye/proteinratio(DOS)fortheabove4conjugates(seenextpage).
3.6 Runyourfunctionaltestsoftheabove4conjugatestodeterminethebestdye/proteinratiotoscaleupyourlabelingreaction.
4.Runconjugationreaction:
4.1Addtheappropriateamountofdyestocksolution(SolutionB)intothevialoftheproteinsolution(SolutionA)witheffectiveshaking.
Note:ThebestmolarratioofSolutionB/SolutionisdeterminedfromStep3.6.IfStep3isskipped,werecommendusing10:1molarratioofSolutionB(dye)/SolutionA(protein).
4.2Continuetorotateorshakethereactionmixtureatroomtemperaturefor30-60minutes.
5.Purifytheconjugation
Thefollowingprotocolisanexampleofdye-proteinconjugatepurificationbyusingaSephadexG-25column.
5.1 PrepareSephadexG-25columnaccordingtothemanufactureinstruction.
5.2 Loadthereactionmixture(directlyfromStep4)tothetopoftheSephadexG-25column.
5.3 AddPBS(pH7.2-7.4)assoonasthesamplerunsjustbelowthetopresinsurface.
5.4 AddmorePBS(pH7.2-7.4)tothedesiredsampletocompletethecolumnpurification.Combinethefractionsthatcontainthedesireddye-proteinconjugate.
Note1:Forimmediateuse,thedye-proteinconjugateneedbedilutedwithstainingbuffer,andaliquotedformultipleuses.
Note2:Forlongertermstorage,dye-proteinconjugatesolutionneedbeconcentratedorfreezedried(seebelow).
CharacterizetheDesiredDye-ProteinConjugate
TheDegreeofSubstitution(DOS)isthemostimportantfactorforcharacterizingdye-labeledprotein.ProteinsoflowerDOSusuallyhaveweakerfluorescenceintensity,butproteinsofhigherDOS(e.g.DOS>6)tendtohavereducedfluorescencetoo.TheoptimalDOSformostantibodiesisrecommendedbetween2and10dependingonthepropertiesofdyeandprotein.Foreffectivelabeling,thedegreeofsubstitutionshouldbecontrolledtohave4-10molesofICGtoonemoleofantibody.ThefollowingstepsareusedtodeterminetheDOSofICGlabeledproteins.
1.Measureabsorption:
Tomeasuretheabsorptionspectrumofadye-proteinconjugate,itisrecommendedtokeepthesampleconcentrationintherangeof1-10µMdependingontheextinctioncoefficientofthedye.
2.ReadOD(absorbance)at280nmanddyemaximumabsorption(ƛmax=785nmforICGdyes):
Formostspectrophotometers,thesample(fromthecolumnfractions)needbedilutedwithde-ionizedwatersothattheODvaluesareintherangeof0.1to0.9.TheO.D.(absorbance)at280nmisthemaximumabsorptionofproteinwhile785nmisthemaximumabsorptionofICGdyes.ToobtainaccurateDOS,makesurethattheconjugateisfreeofthenon-conjugateddye.
3.CalculateDOSusingthefollowingequations:
3.1 Calculateproteinconcentration
3.2 Calculate
3.3 CalculatethedegreeoflabelingDOS=[Dye]/[Protein]=[DOD785´Pε280]/[230000×(A280-0.073A785)]
[Dye]isthedyeconcentration,andcanbereADIlycalculatedfromtheBee-LambertLaw:A=εdyeCL.[Protein]istheproteinconcentration.Thisvaluecanbeeitherestimatedbytheweight(addedtothereaction)iftheconjugationefficiencyishighenough(preferably>70%)ormoreaccuratelycalculatedbytheBeer-LambertLaw:A=εproteinCL.Forexample,IgGhastheεvaluetobe203,000cm-1M-1.Pε280proteinmolarextinctioncoefficientat280nm(e.g.themolarextinctioncoefficientofIgGis203,000
cm-1M-1).CF(dyeabsorptioncorrectionfactorat280nm)=OD280/OD750= 0.073forICG-Sulfo-OSu.230,000cm-1M-1isthemolarextinctioncoefficientofICG-Sulfo-OSu.
References&Citations | CitationExplorer |
AssessmentofLexiscanforBloodBrainBarrierdisruptiontofacilitateFluorescencebrainimaging
Authors:RebeccaWPak,HanhLe,HeatherValentine,DanielThorek,ArmanRahmim,DeanWong,JinUKang
Journal:(2017):ATu3B--2
Bioengineeringofinjectableencapsulatedaggregatesofpluripotentstemcellsfortherapyofmyocardialinfarction
Authors:ShutingZhao,ZhaobinXu,HaiWang,BenjaminEReese,LiubovVGushchina,MengJiang,PranayAgarwal,JiangshengXu,MingjunZhang,RulongShen
Journal:NatureCommunications(2016):13306
DeepPhotoacoustic/Luminescence/MagneticResonanceMultimodalImaginginLivingSubjectsUsingHigh-EfficiencyUpconversionNanocomposites
Authors:YuLiu,NingKang,JingLv,ZijianZhou,QingliangZhao,LingcengMa,ZhongChen,LeiRen,LimingNie
Journal:AdvancedMaterials(2016)
Single-LayerMoS2NanosheetswithAmplifiedPhotoacousticEffectforHighlySensitivePhotoacousticImagingofOrthotopicBrainTumors
Authors:JingqinChen,ChengboLiu,DehongHu,FengWang,HaiweiWu,XiaojingGong,XinLiu,LiangSong,ZonghaiSheng,HairongZheng
Journal:AdvancedFunctionalMaterials(2016)
InVitroandInVivoAnalysisofIndocyanineGreen-LabeledPanitumumabforOpticalImagingACautionaryTale
Authors:YangZhou,Young-SeungKim,DianeEMilenic,KwamenaEBaidoo,MartinWBrechbiel
Journal:Bioconjugatechemistry(2014):1801--1810